| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
23/03/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
07/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
|
Autor : |
STEWART, S.; RODRIGUEZ, M.; MATTOS, N.; ABREO, E. |
|
Afiliación : |
SILVINA MARIA STEWART SONEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARCELO JULIAN RODRIGUEZ ALONZO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NATALIA MATTOS MENDOZA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; EDUARDO RAUL ABREO GIMENEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
First report of zonate leaf spot in sorghum caused by Microdochium sorghi in Uruguay. (Comunicación breve). [Primer reporte de mancha zonada de la hoja del sorgo causada por Microdochium sorghi en Uruguay]. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, 2019, 23(2):1-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.23.74 |
|
ISSN : |
2301-1548 |
|
DOI : |
10.31285/AGRO.23.74 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Recibido: 11/06/2018 / Aceptado: 13/03/2019.
Corresponding author: Silvina Stewart; Email: sstewart@inia.org.uy |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Sorghum leaves with concentric lesions, alternating purple to red and beige to cinnamon, were observed for the first time inJanuary 2017. The same symptoms were observed later in 29 % of sorghum cultivars in official Evaluación Nacional deCultivares INASE-INIA trials. The pathogen was identified as Microdochium sorghi (syn. Gloeocercospora sorghi) oncepathogenicity trials, morphological and molecular descriptions were done. This is the first report of this pathogen affectingsorghum in Uruguay.
RESUMEN.
En enero de 2017 se observaron por primera vez hojas de sorgo con lesiones formando manchas concéntricas,alternando color púrpura o rojo con bandas beige o canela. La misma sintomatología fue observada posteriormente en el29 % de los materiales de los ensayos de sorgo de Evaluación Nacional de Cultivares INASE-INIA. Una vez realizada laprueba de patogenicidad, descripción morfológica y molecular, se identificó al patógeno como Microdochium sorghi (sin.Gloeocercospora sorghi). Este es el primer reporte de este patógeno afectando sorgo en Uruguay. |
|
Palabras claves : |
Diagnose; Diagnóstico; Gloeocercospora sorghi; ITS; Koch's postulate; Postulado Koch. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
H20 Enfermedades de las plantas |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/14324/1/Stewart-S.-et-al.-2019.-Agrociencia-Uruguay.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02083naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1060944
005 2022-09-07
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2301-1548
024 7 $a10.31285/AGRO.23.74$2DOI
100 1 $aSTEWART, S.
245 $aFirst report of zonate leaf spot in sorghum caused by Microdochium sorghi in Uruguay. (Comunicación breve). [Primer reporte de mancha zonada de la hoja del sorgo causada por Microdochium sorghi en Uruguay].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aArticle history: Recibido: 11/06/2018 / Aceptado: 13/03/2019. Corresponding author: Silvina Stewart; Email: sstewart@inia.org.uy
520 $aABSTRACT. Sorghum leaves with concentric lesions, alternating purple to red and beige to cinnamon, were observed for the first time inJanuary 2017. The same symptoms were observed later in 29 % of sorghum cultivars in official Evaluación Nacional deCultivares INASE-INIA trials. The pathogen was identified as Microdochium sorghi (syn. Gloeocercospora sorghi) oncepathogenicity trials, morphological and molecular descriptions were done. This is the first report of this pathogen affectingsorghum in Uruguay. RESUMEN. En enero de 2017 se observaron por primera vez hojas de sorgo con lesiones formando manchas concéntricas,alternando color púrpura o rojo con bandas beige o canela. La misma sintomatología fue observada posteriormente en el29 % de los materiales de los ensayos de sorgo de Evaluación Nacional de Cultivares INASE-INIA. Una vez realizada laprueba de patogenicidad, descripción morfológica y molecular, se identificó al patógeno como Microdochium sorghi (sin.Gloeocercospora sorghi). Este es el primer reporte de este patógeno afectando sorgo en Uruguay.
653 $aDiagnose
653 $aDiagnóstico
653 $aGloeocercospora sorghi
653 $aITS
653 $aKoch's postulate
653 $aPostulado Koch
700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, M.
700 1 $aMATTOS, N.
700 1 $aABREO, E.
773 $tAgrociencia Uruguay, 2019, 23(2):1-5. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.23.74
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
09/11/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/11/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
DINI, M.; RASEIRA, M.C.B.; SCARIOTTO, S.; UENO, B. |
|
Afiliación : |
MAXIMILIANO ANTONIO DINI VIÑOLY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; MARIA DO CARMO BASSOLS RASEIRA, Embrapa Clima Temperado, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, BR 392, km 78, Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas, 96010-971, Brazil; SILVIA SCARIOTTO, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Campus Pato Branco, Via do Conhecimento, km 1, Paraná, Pato Branco, 85503-390, Brazil; BERNARDO UENO, Embrapa Clima Temperado, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, BR 392, km 78, Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas, 96010-971, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Breeding peaches for brown rot resistance in Embrapa. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agronomy, 2022, Volume 12, Issue 10, Article 2306. Gold Open Access. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102306 |
|
ISSN : |
2073-4395 |
|
DOI : |
10.3390/agronomy12102306 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 31 July 2022; Revised 6 September 2022; Accepted 12 September 2022; Published 26 September 2022. -- Correspondence author:
Dini, M.; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Capão do Leão, Brazil; email:mdini@inia.org.uy -- Academic Editor: Bénédicte Quilot-Turion. -- This article belongs to the Special Issue Monilinia on Stone Fruit Species (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy/special_issues/29Q57CSGR4 ) -- LICENSE: Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Brown rot, caused by Monilinia spp., is the main stone fruit disease. Major efforts to detect sources of resistance are being applied by several breeding programs worldwide. The main objective of this study was to seek sources of brown rot resistance, as well as to study the segregation, estimate the heritability, verify the possible existence of the maternal effect, and estimate the genetic advances. For this purpose, 20 parents and 303 seedlings, representing 16 breeding families, and 'Bolinha' (control) have been phenotyped for fruit reaction to brown rot using wounded and non-wounded inoculation procedures in 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 growing seasons. Wounded fruits were very susceptible to brown rot incidence, however, the incidence and severity of non-wounded fruits showed high variability among the evaluated genotypes. Conserva 947 and Conserva 1600 and their progeny, had lower disease incidence and severity than most of the evaluated genotypes. Genetic gain estimation was -5.2 to -30.2% (wounded fruits) and between -15.0 to -25.0% (non-wounded fruits) for brown rot resistance. Selected genotypes were equal to or better than ?Bolinha? in relation to brown rot resistance, with several of them far superior in fruit quality than 'Bolinha', demonstrating the progress of the Embrapa Peach Breeding Program. © 2022 by the authors. |
|
Palabras claves : |
Genetic advance; Genetic resistance; Lesion; Monilinia fructicola (Winter) Honey; Progeny segregation; SISTEMA VEGETAL INTENSIVO - INIA; Sporulation. |
|
Thesagro : |
Prunus persica (L.) Batsch. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16836/1/agronomy-12-02306.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03020naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1063714
005 2022-11-09
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2073-4395
024 7 $a10.3390/agronomy12102306$2DOI
100 1 $aDINI, M.
245 $aBreeding peaches for brown rot resistance in Embrapa.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 31 July 2022; Revised 6 September 2022; Accepted 12 September 2022; Published 26 September 2022. -- Correspondence author: Dini, M.; Programa de Pós-Graduação em Agronomia, Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Capão do Leão, Brazil; email:mdini@inia.org.uy -- Academic Editor: Bénédicte Quilot-Turion. -- This article belongs to the Special Issue Monilinia on Stone Fruit Species (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy/special_issues/29Q57CSGR4 ) -- LICENSE: Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
520 $aABSTRACT.- Brown rot, caused by Monilinia spp., is the main stone fruit disease. Major efforts to detect sources of resistance are being applied by several breeding programs worldwide. The main objective of this study was to seek sources of brown rot resistance, as well as to study the segregation, estimate the heritability, verify the possible existence of the maternal effect, and estimate the genetic advances. For this purpose, 20 parents and 303 seedlings, representing 16 breeding families, and 'Bolinha' (control) have been phenotyped for fruit reaction to brown rot using wounded and non-wounded inoculation procedures in 2015-2016, 2016-2017, and 2017-2018 growing seasons. Wounded fruits were very susceptible to brown rot incidence, however, the incidence and severity of non-wounded fruits showed high variability among the evaluated genotypes. Conserva 947 and Conserva 1600 and their progeny, had lower disease incidence and severity than most of the evaluated genotypes. Genetic gain estimation was -5.2 to -30.2% (wounded fruits) and between -15.0 to -25.0% (non-wounded fruits) for brown rot resistance. Selected genotypes were equal to or better than ?Bolinha? in relation to brown rot resistance, with several of them far superior in fruit quality than 'Bolinha', demonstrating the progress of the Embrapa Peach Breeding Program. © 2022 by the authors.
650 $aPrunus persica (L.) Batsch
653 $aGenetic advance
653 $aGenetic resistance
653 $aLesion
653 $aMonilinia fructicola (Winter) Honey
653 $aProgeny segregation
653 $aSISTEMA VEGETAL INTENSIVO - INIA
653 $aSporulation
700 1 $aRASEIRA, M.C.B.
700 1 $aSCARIOTTO, S.
700 1 $aUENO, B.
773 $tAgronomy, 2022, Volume 12, Issue 10, Article 2306. Gold Open Access. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102306
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
